Compare us honestly. It is how we would want to be shopped.

Every comparison here is verified against the live product on a stated date and includes a real section on when to pick the other tool. If a competitor is better for your situation, the page says so.

• Quoting.ai vs Parspec

  Parspec and Quoting.ai automate different quoting jobs. Parspec starts at the construction bid package: it extracts BOMs from bid docs and fixture schedules, matches alternates against a 3.2M+ cut-sheet catalog, and generates submittal and O&M packages, with 8 of the top 10 US electrical distributors as customers. Quoting.ai starts at the inbound RFQ: email, PDF, WhatsApp, fax, and voice turned into ERP quotes and sales orders, with live write-back for DDI Inform and Spruce and a published Human Edit Rate. Electrical and lighting bid desks should look at Parspec first. Lumber, plumbing/PVF, and HVAC desks drowning in transactional RFQs should look at Quoting.ai.

  Verified 2026-07-05

• Quoting.ai vs Endeavor AI

  Endeavor AI and Quoting.ai both turn inbound RFQs and POs into ERP transactions, but they are built for different desks. Endeavor sells a back-office agent suite for manufacturers and big-ERP distributors: order entry, quoting, phone, AP, and AR from one vendor, with the best-documented case metrics in the category. Quoting.ai does one job deeply: RFQ-to-quote and order entry for lumber, plumbing/PVF, electrical, and HVAC distributors, with live write-back on DDI Inform and Spruce, WhatsApp, fax, and voice intake, and a published Human Edit Rate governing Assist, Guarded, and Autopilot modes. If you want one vendor for the whole back office on SAP or Eclipse, evaluate Endeavor. If quoting is the bottleneck, start here.

  Verified 2026-07-05

• Quoting.ai vs Canals AI

  Quoting.ai and Canals AI both turn inbound RFQs into ERP-ready quotes, but for different desks. Canals is a broad back-office suite for mid-to-large electrical, PHCP, and industrial distributors on Eclipse, Prophet 21, Infor, SAP, or Dynamics, with named customers like Turtle and Crescent Electric. Quoting.ai is quoting-first for lumber, plumbing, electrical, and HVAC distributors: live write-back to DDI Inform and Spruce, WhatsApp and fax intake, Assist, Guarded, and Autopilot modes, and a published Human Edit Rate. Want one vendor across the whole back office on a big-distribution ERP? Pick Canals. Run an LBM desk and want measured, governed automation? Pick Quoting.ai.

  Verified 2026-07-05

• Quoting.ai vs Distro

  Distro (distro.app) sells a six-module agentic sales platform for industrial wholesale distributors: RFQ automation, takeoffs, a rep-facing product Q&A agent, a customer chatbot, and AP, with strong Epicor Prophet 21 and Eclipse coverage. Quoting.ai Supply does one job deeply: multichannel RFQ-to-quote-to-order with write-back live in production on DDI Inform and Spruce, measured by a published Human Edit Rate. Pick by shape: one vendor covering the whole front office versus depth on the quoting desk itself, with fax, WhatsApp, and voice intake Distro does not document.

  Verified 2026-07-05

• Quoting.ai vs Togal.AI

  Togal.AI is the general-purpose AI takeoff tool: its Togal Button auto-detects spaces on floor plans across roughly 10 trades, with image and text search to count anything and a well-reviewed product (4.8 stars on G2 across about 57 reviews). Quoting.ai Takeoff covers two trades today, Division 8 doors and windows, but reads the schedule, the plan symbols, and the legend and reconciles all three. Togal counts tags. 4 Eyes catches the opening that is missing from one source entirely, which is the error that costs installed money. Pick by trade breadth versus omission depth.

  Verified 2026-07-05

• Quoting.ai vs Kreo

  Kreo repositioned around agentic AI takeoff in May 2026 with Caddie, a live plan-then-execute agent that measures drawings and produces Excel bills of quantities across eight trades, at transparent self-serve pricing from $35 to $175 per user per month. Quoting.ai Takeoff covers Division 8 doors and windows deeply: schedule semantics, 4 Eyes reconciliation of schedule against plan symbols against legend, and apartment-based numbering. Kreo wins on trade breadth and a quantities-to-cost pipeline; Quoting.ai wins where a missed opening is the expensive failure and where the number must land in an ERP, not a spreadsheet.

  Verified 2026-07-05

• Quoting.ai vs STACK

  STACK is an established cloud construction platform spanning plan management, multi-trade takeoff, estimating with cost data, and field tools, at public pricing of $249 to $299 per user per month with AI takeoff features layered on as paid add-ons. Quoting.ai Takeoff is narrower and deeper: Division 8 doors and windows read from the full set with 4 Eyes cross-checking schedule against plan symbols against legend. STACK is the safer one-vendor bid-to-field choice across many trades; Quoting.ai is the specialist where a missed opening costs installed money and the schedule is the document of record.

  Verified 2026-07-05

• Quoting.ai vs PlanSwift

  PlanSwift, owned by ConstructConnect, is the incumbent Windows desktop takeoff and estimating tool, $2,000 per year published, trusted by a huge installed base and recently retrofitted with Takeoff Boost AI: auto takeoff, auto count, auto scale, and auto bookmark, announced April 2026. Quoting.ai Takeoff runs in the browser on WebGPU, reads the full set including the schedule and legend, and cross-checks all three sources for omissions. PlanSwift is the proven multi-trade workhorse for Windows-based desks; Quoting.ai is the specialist for Division 8 scopes where workstation lock-in and missed openings both cost real money.

  Verified 2026-07-05

• Quoting.ai vs Bluebeam Revu

  This is a better-together page, honestly framed. Bluebeam Revu is the AEC industry's document platform: markup, measurement, and Studio collaboration your whole project ecosystem already uses, from $260 to $590 per user per year. Its takeoff is fundamentally manual: an estimator clicks every measurement, and even the top Max tier's AI targets design review, not quantity extraction. Quoting.ai Takeoff replaces exactly that counting pass for Division 8: it reads the full set, extracts the schedule, counts symbols, and runs the 4 Eyes omission check. Keep Revu for markup and coordination. Stop hand-counting openings in it.

  Verified 2026-07-05