Quoting.ai vs Endeavor AI

Do Quoting.ai and Endeavor AI even do the same job?

Partly, and the overlap is exactly where you should look hardest. Endeavor AI leads with "AI Agents for the Back Office": a suite of five modules covering Order Entry AI, Quote Automation, Phone Call Automation, Accounts Payable, and Accounts Receivable, with price optimization, lead gen, and scheduling deeper in the site. The flagship motion is touchless order capture from emails, PDFs, spreadsheets, phone calls, and voicemail, written straight into the ERP. Their proof skews manufacturer: ClarkDietrich, Viking Group, Bridgestone Americas, Oshkosh, and Menasha, alongside distributors Star Lumber and Russin. They raised a $7M seed led by Craft Ventures in October 2024.

Quoting.ai Supply does one job: AI RFQ-to-quote and order entry for distributors in lumber, plumbing/PVF, electrical, and HVAC. Intake runs across email, PDF, WhatsApp, fax, and voice, including Spanish, Hebrew, and Yiddish voice notes. Lines are matched against your item file, priced from your ERP's customer price levels, and routed through an approval inbox before anything writes back.

The honest split: Endeavor is a consolidation play, Quoting.ai is a depth play. If you want AP and AR from the same vendor, that is a real advantage and Quoting.ai does not offer it. If quoting is the job, note that quoting is one module among five plus at Endeavor, and their quoting page reuses order-entry copy. A quoting-first product spends all of its effort on RFQ interpretation, SKU matching, and pricing logic.

How does each one earn trust with automation?

Endeavor markets a touchless percentage, and their evidence is genuinely strong: the Viking case study reports 91% of orders touchless, 99% extraction accuracy, corrections falling from 600 plus to under 50 in the first month, and 1,307 quotes processed in a single month, 1,193 by AI and 114 human-reviewed. That is the best-documented result set in this category, and it deserves to be said plainly. Human review appears inside that case study, where complex orders are presented for rapid validation, but the site publishes no ongoing trust metric, no graduated autonomy controls, and no named approval-inbox product.

Quoting.ai takes the opposite posture: it assumes you should not have to take accuracy on faith. The Human Edit Rate, the measured percent of AI lines your team actually corrects, is shown to you as a customer. Automation is graduated through Assist, Guarded, and Autopilot modes, so the system earns autonomy line by line instead of asking for it up front. Whichever vendor you pick, ask the same question: how do you verify the AI is safe to promote to autopilot, and can I see the number?

Which ERPs and intake channels does each cover?

This is where the two products serve visibly different buyers. Endeavor lists ten ERP integrations, including Epicor Eclipse, Prophet 21, Infor SX and CloudSuite, SAP, Oracle, and Microsoft Dynamics, which covers most electrical, PVF, and HVAC distributor incumbency plus the big manufacturer systems. What is missing are the LBM-native ERPs: DDI Inform and Spruce are absent from their list, even though they run lumber and building materials vertical pages. Quoting.ai is the mirror image: live write-back on DDI Inform and Spruce today, Epicor, NetSuite, and SAP in development, and an ERP-light mode for everything else. Neither side should pretend otherwise, so here is the checkable version:

• ▪ERP write-back live today: Quoting.ai on DDI Inform and Spruce; Endeavor on its ten-ERP list including Epicor Eclipse, Prophet 21, Infor SX, SAP, Oracle, and Dynamics
• ▪In development at Quoting.ai: Epicor, NetSuite, and SAP; ERP-light mode covers other systems in the meantime
• ▪Missing from Endeavor's list: DDI Inform and Spruce, the ERPs most lumber and building materials yards actually run
• ▪Intake at Endeavor: email, PDF, spreadsheet, phone calls, and voicemail; no WhatsApp or fax mentioned anywhere on their site
• ▪Intake at Quoting.ai: email, PDF, WhatsApp, fax, and voice, including English, Spanish, Hebrew, and Yiddish voice notes

What about pricing, proof, and time to live?

Pricing: Endeavor's comparison pages attack Conexiom on per-line-item pricing and promise flexible contracts, but their own numbers are not published on their site as of July 2026, and their /pricing URL returned a 404. Third-party listings describe custom pricing; that is not verified on Endeavor's own site. Quoting.ai publishes its pricing method plus example scenarios at /pricing, so you can size the cost before anyone books a call.

Proof: here honesty cuts both ways. Endeavor has the stronger published evidence, with hard case numbers and an enterprise logo wall. Quoting.ai has zero named customers publicly and shows its accuracy customer by customer through the Human Edit Rate instead. Neither vendor has meaningful G2 or Capterra review volume, so real diligence for both means asking for references on your specific ERP and running a measured pilot.

Time to live: Endeavor claims a staged rollout of integrate on day 1, train by day 5, live by day 14, and their Star Lumber case study claims a 5-day implementation. Quoting.ai setup is two steps plus an included white-glove kickoff call. Both are fast; the difference is what you are standing up, a back-office suite versus a quoting desk.